Errors of Averroes
Logic, Poetry and Commentary
By (author) Marco Calil
This book refutes the common “error” attributed to Averroes, demonstrating that his equation of mad (encomium) and hij ‘ (invective) with Greek tragedy/comedy is not an inadequacy but a functional use within his logical system and the repertoire of Arabic poetry.
Marco Calil re-examines the Science of the Art of Poetry through Averroes’ Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics. The book challenges the persistent accusation that Averroes made an “error” by inappropriately equating the Arabic terms mad (encomium) and hij ‘ (invective) with Greek “tragedy” and “comedy”. Adopting a counter-accusatory approach, the author rigorously demonstrates that no such error exists in Averroes’ Commentary.
The book reveals that Averroes’ use of these terms is not about perfect equivalence, but rather their functional integration within his logico-analytical system and the repertoire of Arabic poetry. By defining mad and hij ‘ through primary sources on Arabic Poetry, Poetics, and Belles-Lettres (adab), the work shows their widespread presence in various textual forms beyond philosophical commentary. This study dispels the notion of error as inadequate correspondence and refutes the idea that pre-modern Arabic poetic canons are “trivial”. It offers a sophisticated new perspective on a classic debate.
This book refutes the common “error” attributed to Averroes, demonstrating that his equation of mad (encomium) and hij ‘ (invective) with Greek tragedy/comedy is not an inadequacy but a functional use within his logical system and the repertoire of Arabic poetry.
Marco Calil re-examines the Science of the Art of Poetry through Averroes’ Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics. The book challenges the persistent accusation that Averroes made an “error” by inappropriately equating the Arabic terms mad (encomium) and hij ‘ (invective) with Greek “tragedy” and “comedy”. Adopting a counter-accusatory approach, the author rigorously demonstrates that no such error exists in Averroes’ Commentary.
The book reveals that Averroes’ use of these terms is not about perfect equivalence, but rather their functional integration within his logico-analytical system and the repertoire of Arabic poetry. By defining mad and hij ‘ through primary sources on Arabic Poetry, Poetics, and Belles-Lettres (adab), the work shows their widespread presence in various textual forms beyond philosophical commentary. This study dispels the notion of error as inadequate correspondence and refutes the idea that pre-modern Arabic poetic canons are “trivial”. It offers a sophisticated new perspective on a classic debate.
- By (author) Marco Calil
Similar Books
Ars Prophetica
Theology in the Poetry of Twentieth-Century Hebrew Poets Avraham Halfi, Shin Shalom, Amir Gilboa, and T. Carmi
Cahiers de l’Association internationale des études françaises
J. M. G. Le Clézio - Enseigner les littératures francophones aujourd’hui - Récit de soi et expérience de l’illusion (XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles)
Volume 78
Cahiers de littérature française
Les Métamorphoses du texte. Enjeux intertextuels et transpositions visuelles
Volume 25
Cahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes – Journal of Medieval and Humanistic Studies
Volume 51
Cahiers de sémiotique des cultures
Ponctuation et sens. Nouvelles perspectives / Punctuation and meaning. New perspectives
Volume 6
CompLit
Myth, Folklore and Magic in European Literatures. Critical and Contemporary Reconfigurations
Dis/United States of Vulnerability
Literary and Cultural Transgressions in U.S. Poetry Since the 1960s
Volume 330
European Drama and Performance Studies
Dramatisations politiques. Théâtre, politique et idéologie au XIXe siècle (1806-1914)
Volume 27
La Lettre clandestine
La littérature philosophique clandestine, ses éditeurs et ses éditions
Volume 34
La Revue des lettres modernes
« Afin que rien ne meure ». Le deuil dans et de l’œuvre de Marguerite Duras
Volume 9
